Login
Today on the Power & Energy Channel
Sponsored by  
Dr Hans-Peter Sollinger, president of Voith Paper, has spent the whole of his working life at the technological production end of the paper industry. ...  Read More
Sponsored By

       Print          Email

Tissue production: who’s the daddy?


   

A study of 155 machines in 82 mills reveals the producers and countries that are making a mark in tissue production

July 2008
By Tea Tuuli, Product Manager, Cost Benchmarking, RISI

Although many paper grades are threatened by a growing public perception that “paper is waste”, few people’s environmental fervor extends so far as to advocate abandoning the use of tissue. In the height of hay fever season, we wipe our streaming eyes with our trusty Kleenex and take a moment to examine a dynamic and growing market sector.

RISI’s European Tissue Competitive Cost Benchmarking Studies analyze over 4.7 million tonnes of retail (at-home) and 1.2 million tonnes of commercial (away-from-home) tissue production in Europe. Of this, 54% is bathroom tissue, 30% is towel, 5% is napkin and 9% is facial, in addition to 2% of other products, such as industrial wipes.

SCA Hygiene, Kimberly-Clark, Georgia-Pacific and Sofidel dominate European tissue production, accounting for 61% of the benchmarked capacity. SCA Hygiene’s recent acquisition of mills from Procter & Gamble raised the firm’s total market share to 27% which is more than double that of its nearest rivals, which each hold a share between 10-12%.

The studies cover 155 machines in 82 mills. Of these, 54 were estimated to be swing machines, i.e. producing both retail and commercial grades. SCA Hygiene has the largest number of machines (34) followed by Georgia-Pacific and Kimberly-Clark, each with 16, and Sofidel with 15 tissue machines.

Figure 1 shows the European tissue machine level cash manufacturing cost curve. Each of the bars in the curve represent one product produced on one machine. The bars are arranged by ascending order of cash cost from left to right with a region indicated. For each bar, the height represents the cash cost while the width denotes the capacity of each product.

A weighted average total cash manufacturing cost for all tissue products is $1,101/tonne, ranging from $562/tonne to $1,392/tonne. The lowest weighted average cash cost, $1,017/tonne, is for commercial bathroom tissue, followed by $1,026/tonne for commercial towel. The average cost for retail bathroom tissue is $1,092/tonne and for retail towel the average cash manufacturing cost is $1,153/tonne. The highest cost product is facial tissue with a cash cost of $1,199/tonne.

For bathroom tissue, approximately 3.1 million tonnes of production in Europe, the cash manufacturing cost varies from $562/tonne to $1,374/tonne. Kitchen towel production costs range from $816/tonne to $1,378/tonne for the total benchmarked production of 1.8 million tonnes/yr.

Figure 1 - European retail and commercial tissue machine level cost of supply
Figure 1 - European retail and commercial tissue machine level cost of supply

Retail vs commercial tissue products

On average, the weighted cash manufacturing cost for retail and commercial tissue varies 3-13%. For example the weighted average cash cost for retail bathroom tissue is 1,092/tonne and for commercial tissue $1,017/tonne. The biggest difference on average, $1,026/tonne for commercial versus $1,153/tonne for retail, is between towel grades, due to the high amount of retail through air directed (TAD) towel tissue produced. Another explanation is the fiber furnish, which varies a lot between high end retail towel and low quality recycled fiber based towel tissue.

Through air drying in Europe

The high quality and high performance TAD products have not taken off in Europe the same way as in North America, mostly due to less demanding customers, who are unwilling to pay the premium for TAD products, as well as to higher energy prices needed in TAD production. RISI’s European tissue studies benchmarked 13 TAD machines, producing approximately 690,000 tonnes/yr of tissue. Average cash manufacturing cost for TAD products is $1,223/tonne, being 13% higher than the cash cost of normal tissue products, $1,085/tonne. The divergence is attributable to higher input costs for energy and chemicals.

Tissue geography

In the study, the four largest tissue-producing countries (Italy, Germany, the UK and Spain) account for almost 66% of the total benchmarked production. The lowest cost countries are Russia, the Slovak Republic and Austria, due to heavily integrated recovered paper and low labor rates. The high-end countries are Italy and the UK that operate mostly with market chemical pulp and have faced increased energy costs.

Figure 2 - European and North American retail and commercial tissue machine level cost of supply
Figure 2 - European and North American retail and commercial tissue machine level cost of supply

Comparing with North America

Figure 2 shows the cost curve for both European and North American tissue products. In North America, RISI benchmarks 7.2 million tonnes of tissue production with a weighted average cash manufacturing cost of $893/tonne, which is 19% lower than European cash cost. The difference is explained mostly by higher fiber and energy costs in Europe. In the case of fiber, the level of integration plays a crucial role: in Europe only SCA Hygiene Mannheim mill is partially integrated for wood, the rest of the mills purchase all their chemical pulp from the open market. In North America a far higher incidence of mills are integrated to wood. For recycled fiber, there are several integrated mills in both regions.

Almost one third of the lowest cost capacity on the cost curve in figure 2 is North American, only Russian mills being able to compete with their low cost structure. This is obviously helped by the dollar-favoring currency exchange rate at the moment. The high cost producers are almost all European, with an exception of the highest cost mill being again North American.

Machine productivity in Europe and North America

Of the 155 machines benchmarked in Europe and 186 machines in North America, the European machines win the productivity contest, which in this case is defined as total machine capacity divided by trim width. The advantages of faster machines are demonstrated by the figures: the average European tissue machine has a productivity of 26.7 tonne/d/m, while North America lags 4.5% behind with an average productivity of 25.5 tonne/d/m.

Given that tissue is the one paper grade where North America is still thriving, a more profound outlook on the tissue industry will be available once RISI’s North American Retail and Commercial Tissue machine level studies 2008 come out this summer!

This article is based on the results of RISI’s European Retail and Commercial Tissue Machine Level Cost Benchmarking Study 2008. For further information about the study contact Matt Graves on +32 2 536 0747; or email: mgraves@risiinfo.com.

Pulp & Paper International is FREE to qualified subscribers. Click here to find out more.

Rate this article
Not Useful   Useful

What do you see as being the major challenges in Asia over the next 10 years?
  • Overcapacity
  • Fiber supply
  • Energy restrictions
Vote

 
Pulp & Paper - Wood Products - Timber - Tissue - Nonwovens - Markets & Prices - Forecasts & Analysis - Historical Data - Mill Intelligence
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact Us
© Copyright 2009 RISI, Inc. | Boston | Brussels | Atlanta | San Francisco | Shanghai | Singapore | São Paulo